Connect the systems
your business relies on.

It depends on the system. There may be another reliable way to exchange data, such as exports, imports, webhooks or an existing integration method. If the platform does not provide a sensible way to connect to it, we will explain the limitation rather than build something fragile around it.

Yes. We can review an existing integration where data is unreliable, processes have changed or additional functionality is needed. We look at the current code, the systems involved and any third-party dependencies before agreeing what can safely be changed.

Third-party platforms can change their APIs, authentication methods or available functionality. Where appropriate, we build integrations so failures can be identified and handled clearly, and we can provide ongoing support when external changes require development work.

Not necessarily. Headless is useful where separating the front end gives a genuine advantage, but it also introduces additional systems to develop and maintain. We recommend it where it solves a real requirement, not simply because it is a newer technical approach.

No. The same approach can be used with content platforms, membership systems and other applications where the customer-facing website needs to be separate from the underlying system. Ecommerce is just one common use case.

Yes, where the systems involved allow it. Some integrations only need information to move in one direction, while others need changes to be synchronised between multiple platforms. We define which system is responsible for each piece of information before development begins.

Yes. Integrations often benefit from ongoing monitoring and maintenance because they depend on more than one system. We can support the integration, investigate failures and make changes when your requirements or the connected platforms change.